Findings

CVE-2020-10735

A flaw was found in python.

Published Sep 9, 2022 · updated Oct 14, 2026 · python python

A flaw was found in python. In algorithms with quadratic time complexity using non-binary bases, when using int("text"), a system could take 50ms to parse an int string with 100,000 digits and 5s for 1,000,000 digits (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), and int() for binary bases 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 are not affected). The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Sep 9, 2022 · NIST NVD

    Detected

    A flaw was found in python. In algorithms with quadratic time complexity using non-binary bases, when using int("text"), a system could take 50ms to parse an int string with 100,000 digits and 5s for 1,000,000 digits (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), and int() for binary bases 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 are not affected). The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

  2. Oct 14, 2026 · NIST NVD

    Updated

    A flaw was found in python. In algorithms with quadratic time complexity using non-binary bases, when using int("text"), a system could take 50ms to parse an int string with 100,000 digits and 5s for 1,000,000 digits (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), and int() for binary bases 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 are not affected). The highest threat from this vulnerability is to system availability.

Affected

  • cpe python/pythonversion unspecified
  • cpe python/python3.11.0
  • cpe redhat/quay3.0.0

Sources

  • CVE.orgCVE-2020-10735

    Official CVE identifier

    cve.org
  • NIST NVDCVE-2020-10735

    A flaw was found in python. In algorithms with quadratic time complexity using non-binary bases, when using int("text"), a system could take 50ms to parse an int string with 100,000 digits and 5s for 1,000,000 digits (float, decimal, int.from_bytes(), and int() for binary bases 2

    nvd.nist.gov

References