Findings

CVE-2026-107282

AsyncHttpClient: Replay to a different host sends the original host request and credentials to the new host

Published Oct 8, 2026 · corrected/updated Oct 8, 2026 · evidence confidence high

### Impact When a request is replayed onto a different host, the client updates only the current request and leaves the target request pointing at the original host. Four consumers read that stale value, and each one sends the first host's request, credentials, or both to the second host. A replay happens through documented, ordinary features: a that returns a different request, which is the supported failover pattern, and the IOException retry path. The attacker does not need to induce the replay; an application that uses failover produces it by design. * The socket to host B is filed in the connection pool under host A's key. A later request the application addresses to A is served over the connection to B, and A's header goes to B. * Over a CONNECT tunnel, the client tunnels to B and negotiates TLS with B correctly, then writes A's request into that tunnel. B receives A's path, A's , and A's . TLS does not protect against this, because the handshake really is with B, so no certificate mismatch occurs. * The replay reuses the original realm, so A's credentials are regenerated onto a replay request that carries no realm of its own. The cross-origin redirect path strips realms for exactly this reason; the replay path never did. * The stale value also decides whether TLS is used at all. When the original request was and the replay is , no SSL handler is installed and the replayed request, credentials included, is written in cleartext. ### Affected versions * 3.x: up to and including 3.0.12 * 2.x: up to and including 2.16.0 Both lines are affected identically. This is long-standing behaviour, not a recent regression. ### Patches Fixed in 3.0.13 on the 3.x line and in 2.16.1 on the 2.x line. The target request now moves when a request is replayed, and the proxy moves with it: the proxy is part of the connection pool key, so correcting only the host would convert a harmless pool miss into a hit and route a proxied connection to a direct request. ### Workarounds Do not u

Grounded briefings

Catalog interpretations for three audiences. Each brief cites ingested metadata and the original advisories below. They are not independent research and they do not invent exploit steps.

Executive

CVE-2026-107282 is a critical public vulnerability record for this product. It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited catalog. Check the linked vendor or CERT advisories for patch status. This summary is a catalog interpretation of the ingested metadata and cites the original advisories below.

System administrator

Identify whether this product is in your estate, then compare installed versions with the affected ranges. Affected packages or ranges on record: org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client (2.0.0 → 2.16.1); org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client (3.0.0 → 3.0.13). Check the linked vendor or CERT advisories for patch status. Prefer the vendor or distribution advisory linked in Sources before changing production systems. This is a catalog interpretation, not a runbook.

Security analyst

Signals on file: EPSS 0.2%. It is not currently listed in the CISA Known Exploited catalog. Weakness classes: CWE-319, CWE-441, CWE-522. Sources contributing to this record: cve_org, epss, github, osv. Public exploit references, when present, are outbound links only and are not proof of active exploitation. This is a catalog interpretation of stored metadata.

Exploitation and remediation

  • Exploitation evidence

    Not listed as known exploited in CISA KEV. Not in CISA KEV or VulnCheck KEV.

  • Patch and remediation

    No required-action text is stored yet. Use the vendor or CERT links in Sources for patch availability.

  • Safe detection guidance

    Compare installed versions with the affected ranges below and verify the advisory from the original publisher. This site stores metadata and outbound links only; it does not ship exploit code or proof-of-concept payloads.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Oct 8, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Detected

    ### Impact When a request is replayed onto a different host, the client updates only the current request and leaves the target request pointing at the original host. Four consumers read that stale value, and each one sends the first host's request, credentials, or both to the second host. A replay happens through documented, ordinary features: a that returns a different request, which is the suppo

  2. Oct 8, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Fix available

    org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client fixed in 3.0.13; org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client fixed in 2.16.1

  3. Oct 8, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Fix available

    org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client fixed in 3.0.13

  4. Oct 8, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Fix available

    org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client fixed in 2.16.1

  5. Oct 8, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database

    Updated

    ### Impact When a request is replayed onto a different host, the client updates only the current request and leaves the target request pointing at the original host. Four consumers read that stale value, and each one sends the first host's request, credentials, or both to the second host. A replay happens through documented, ordinary features: a that returns a different request, which is the suppo

Affected

  • Maven org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client2.0.0 → 2.16.1
  • Maven org.asynchttpclient:async-http-client3.0.0 → 3.0.13

Sources

References