ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · CVE-2024-10306

A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster.

Published Apr 23, 2025 · catalog updated Oct 6, 2026 · Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10

Check this week

CVE-2024-10306 is not in CISA KEV. FIRST estimates a 37.00% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Check whether you run Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.

Gaps on this record

  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
Severity
Medium5.4
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
37.00%
Remediation
Advisory link
Affected products
vendor Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 patch: 0:1.3.22-1.el10_0.2

A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the directive should be replaced by the directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/removing/updating nodes for the balancing. However, this host should not be accessible to the public network as it does not serve the general traffic.

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • vendor Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 patch: 0:1.3.22-1.el10_0.2patch: 0:1.3.22-1.el10_0.2

How to fix CVE-2024-10306

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

CVE-2024-10306 is not in CISA KEV. FIRST estimates a 37.00% chance of exploitation in the next 30 days. Check whether you run Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10.

Which versions are affected?

Compare what you have installed with Red Hat Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 patch: 0:1.3.22-1.el10_0.2 patch: 0:1.3.22-1.el10_0.2. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

No weakness class is stored. EPSS 37.00%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

No public source repository is identified for this product.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Apr 23, 2025 · EUVD

    Detected

    A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the directive should be replaced by the directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/removing/updating nodes for the balancing. However, this host should not be accessible to the public network as it does n

  2. Oct 6, 2026 · EUVD

    Updated

    A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the directive should be replaced by the directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/removing/updating nodes for the balancing. However, this host should not be accessible to the public network as it does n

Sources

  • CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2024-10306

    Official CVE identifier

    cve.org
  • EUVDVulnerability recordEUVD-2025-12236

    A vulnerability was found in mod_proxy_cluster. The issue is that the directive should be replaced by the directive as the former does not restrict IP/host access as would suggest. This means that anyone with access to the host might send MCMP requests that may result in adding/r

    euvd.enisa.europa.eu

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Oct 17, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.