Vulnerability · CVE-2026-54641
OpenRemote has Cross-Realm User Information Disclosure in UserResourceImpl
Published Jul 6, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 13, 2026 · OpenRemote has Cross-Realm User
Check if you run it
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-54641. EPSS is 0.29%. Act only if a listed version of OpenRemote has Cross-Realm User is installed.
Gaps on this record
- The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (OpenRemote has Cross-Realm User).
- No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
- Severity
- High7.7
- Known exploitation
- Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
- EPSS
- 0.29%
- Remediation
- Advisory link
- Affected products
- Maven io.openremote:openremote-manager
### Summary A realm admin of tenant B can read the profile, client roles, and realm roles of any user in any other realm (including the master realm) by supplying the target user's UUID in the REST API path. Three read endpoints in UserResourceImpl check whether the caller holds the read:admin role but omit a check that the target user belongs to the caller's own realm. The vulnerability enables cross-tenant user enumeration and privilege-level reconnaissance. On a multi-tenant deployment the master realm administrator account is reachable from any tenant realm admin. ### Details The affected file is manager/src/main/java/org/openremote/manager/security/UserResourceImpl.java. Three methods are missing an authenticated-realm guard: get (line 102): public User get(RequestParams requestParams, String realm, String userId) { boolean hasAdminReadRole = hasResourceRole(ClientRole.READ_ADMIN.getValue(), Constants.KEYCLOAK_CLIENT_ID); if (!hasAdminReadRole && !Objects.equals(getUserId(), userId)) { throw new ForbiddenException("..."); } try { return identityService.getIdentityProvider().getUser(userId); } ... } The realm path parameter is accepted but never used. getUser(userId) delegates to getUserByIdFromDb(persistenceService, userId) which queries the database by UUID with no realm filter. getUserClientRoles (line 294): public String[] getUserClientRoles(RequestParams requestParams, String realm, String userId, String clientId) { boolean hasAdminReadRole = hasResourceRole(ClientRole.READ_ADMIN.getValue(), Constants.KEYCLOAK_CLIENT_ID); if (!hasAdminReadRole && !Objects.equals(getUserId(), userId)) { throw new ForbiddenException("..."); } try { return identityService.getIdentityProvider().getUserClientRoles(realm, userId, clientId); } ... } getUserRealmRoles (line 313): public String[] getUserRealmRoles(RequestParams requestParams, String realm, String userId) { boolean hasAdminReadRole = hasResourceRole(ClientRole.READ_ADMIN.getValue(), Constants.KEYCLOAK_CLIENT_ID); if
Are you affected?
Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.
The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.
- Maven io.openremote:openremote-manager0 → 1.24.2
How to fix CVE-2026-54641
Recommended remediation
A patch or advisory reference is linked. Open the original publisher for availability by product version.
Official advisories
What to do
Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.
Should you patch?
No confirmed exploitation is on record for CVE-2026-54641. EPSS is 0.29%. Act only if a listed version of OpenRemote has Cross-Realm User is installed.
Which versions are affected?
Compare what you have installed with 0 → 1.24.2. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.
What should an analyst verify?
CWE-639: Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key. EPSS 0.29%. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.
Code
The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.
Timeline
Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.
Jul 6, 2026 · Catalog
Detected
### Summary A realm admin of tenant B can read the profile, client roles, and realm roles of any user in any other realm (including the master realm) by supplying the target user's UUID in the REST API path. Three read endpoints in UserResourceImpl check whether the caller holds the read:admin role but omit a check that the target user belongs to the caller's own realm. The vulnerability enables c
Oct 13, 2026 · Catalog
Fix available
Maven io.openremote:openremote-manager 0 → 1.24.2
Oct 13, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database
Fix available
io.openremote:openremote-manager fixed in 1.24.2
Oct 13, 2026 · GitHub Advisory Database
Fix available
io.openremote:openremote-manager fixed in 1.24.2
Oct 13, 2026 · Catalog
Updated
### Summary A realm admin of tenant B can read the profile, client roles, and realm roles of any user in any other realm (including the master realm) by supplying the target user's UUID in the REST API path. Three read endpoints in UserResourceImpl check whether the caller holds the read:admin role but omit a check that the target user belongs to the caller's own realm. The vulnerability enables c
Sources
- CVE.orgVulnerability recordCVE-2026-54641
Official CVE identifier
cve.org - FIRST EPSSExploitation probabilityCVE-2026-54641
30-day exploitation probability 0.3%
first.org - GitHub Advisory DatabasePackage advisoryGHSA-xqr9-4wvv-gvch
GitHub Advisory Database record mirrored by OSV.
github.com - OpenSSF OSV / OSV ScannerPackage advisoryGHSA-xqr9-4wvv-gvch
OpenRemote has Cross-Realm User Information Disclosure in UserResourceImpl
osv.dev
References
Freshness
Last verified in this catalog Oct 18, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.