ZDF
Sign inSign up

Vulnerabilities

Vulnerability · MAL-2026-17884

Malicious code in getpubip (PyPI)

Published Oct 15, 2026 · catalog updated Oct 15, 2026 · Malicious code in getpubip

Open the advisory

Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for MAL-2026-17884. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare Malicious code in getpubip with the linked advisory before you change production.

Gaps on this record

  • The stored product name is a package slug. The name on this page is taken from the title (Malicious code in getpubip).
  • No vendor fix or required action is stored. Compare the linked advisory before you change production.
  • EPSS is missing. A missing score is not a low risk.
Severity
Unknown—
Known exploitation
Not in CISA/VulnCheck KEV
EPSS
Awaiting synchronization with FIRST
Remediation
Not established
Affected products
PyPI getpubip

--- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: kam193 (6a07d6dd387bbd88252ffdda7f8c10daf988f0622250daf20e7ec8ee0f63c6d5) During import, obfuscated code downloads and executes an infostealer. Campaign shares some similarities with the campaign 2026-10-fontcase. --- Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers. Campaign: 2026-10-getpubip Reasons (based on the campaign): - Downloads and executes a remote executable. - infostealer - exfiltration-browser-data - obfuscation

Are you affected?

Enter the version you run. The result uses only the ranges stored on this record.

The check returns affected, not affected, or incomplete. It does not guess a version that is missing from the record.

  • PyPI getpubip0.1.0, 0.1.1, 0.1.2

How to fix MAL-2026-17884

What to do

Three questions, each answered from this record only. Confirm the vendor advisory before you patch.

Should you patch?

Exploitation likelihood is not on this record for MAL-2026-17884. A missing EPSS score is not a low risk. Compare Malicious code in getpubip with the linked advisory before you change production.

Which versions are affected?

Compare what you have installed with 0.1.0, 0.1.1, 0.1.2. Compare the installed version with the linked vendor advisory before you change production.

What should an analyst verify?

No weakness class is stored. EPSS is not on this record yet. There is no CISA KEV listing. No Exploit-DB or Metasploit reference is linked. Use the source links for the original advisory.

Code

The project this record applies to. Exploit listings stay in References.

Timeline

Detection, updates, and resolution for this record.

  1. Oct 15, 2026 · OpenSSF OSV / OSV Scanner

    Detected

    --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: kam193 (6a07d6dd387bbd88252ffdda7f8c10daf988f0622250daf20e7ec8ee0f63c6d5) During import, obfuscated code downloads and executes an infostealer. Campaign shares some similarities with the campaign 2026-10-fontcase. --- Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers. Campaign: 2026-10-getpubip

  2. Oct 15, 2026 · OpenSSF OSV / OSV Scanner

    Updated

    --- _-= Per source details. Do not edit below this line.=-_ ## Source: kam193 (6a07d6dd387bbd88252ffdda7f8c10daf988f0622250daf20e7ec8ee0f63c6d5) During import, obfuscated code downloads and executes an infostealer. Campaign shares some similarities with the campaign 2026-10-fontcase. --- Category: MALICIOUS - The campaign has clearly malicious intent, like infostealers. Campaign: 2026-10-getpubip

Sources

References

Freshness

Last verified in this catalog Oct 15, 2026. Significant claims (KEV, EPSS, CVSS, affected ranges) come from the source rows above — open the original publisher for the authoritative advisory.